Investigating the relationship between users' information literacy and their satisfaction with library services

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master of Information Management, Department of Information Science and Science, School of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Information Science, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Propose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between users' information literacy and their satisfaction with the central Library services of the University of Mohaghegh Ardabili.
Methodology: This is application research and a survey study. The research methodology is a correlation type. The statistical population consists of 11647 students (undergraduate, graduate, and postgraduate) and faculty staff at University of Mohaghegh Ardabili. The sampling approach is convenience or accidental sampling and the sample size includes 253 persons.
The data-gathering instrument, in this research, includes user satisfaction questionnaires, LibQUAL for local library services, Webqual 4 for web services, and an information literacy questionnaire, based on information literacy competency standards for higher education, developed by ACRL. Data were analyzed by descriptive & inferential statistics (U-Mann Whitney & Kruskal-Wallis test and spearman’s correlation) using SPSS software.
Finding: The findings of this study showed that there is a significant positive correlation between the first standard of information literacy and the second dimension of users satisfaction with local library services, namely, (the ability to determine the nature and extent of the information & the effect of services), the second standard of information literacy and the second dimension of users satisfaction with local library services, namely, (the ability to effectively access the information & the effect of service), the fourth standard of information literacy and the first and second dimensions of users satisfaction with local library services, namely (the ability to effectively use information & the information control) and (the ability to effectively use information & effect of service). In the website section, there is a significant positive correlation between the second standard of information literacy and the first and the second dimensions of satisfaction with the website services, namely,(the ability to effectively access information & website usability), (the ability to effectively access the information & the information quality), the third standard of information literacy and the first dimension of satisfaction with the website services (The ability to critically evaluate information and the usability), the fourth standard of information literacy and the first, second and third dimensions of satisfaction with the website services of this library (ability to effectively use information & the usability), (the ability to effectively use information & information quality) and (the ability to effectively use information & service interaction).On the other hand, the finding of this research showed that in general, users' satisfaction with library services (both website and local services) is relatively desirable, but their information literacy is undesirable. In addition, there is a significant difference between the users' satisfaction on the basis of age and gender, and there is a significant difference between users’ information literacy by age, educational level, and position.
Conclusion: The result of this research showed that in general, there was a significant positive correlation between users' information literacy and their satisfaction with library services, and this correlation was more tangible on library web services.
 

Keywords


  1. 1. Afzali, T. & Tafreshi, S.h. (2010). The Role and Place of Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting Libraries in Promoting Users' Information Literacy. Epistemology, 3(10):1-12.[In Persian]

    2. Aljanabi, A.R.A. & AL-Hadban, W.K.M. (2018). Information Literacy and learners’ satisfaction: The mediating role of social networking technology usage. Retrieved from:

    https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-08-2018-0091.

    3. Association of College & Research Libraries (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago. Retrieved from:

    http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency

    4. Association of College & Research Libraries (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago. Retrieved from: http://www.ala.org/standardsilframework.

    5. Barnes, S.J. & Vidgen, R.T. (2005). Data triangulation in action: using comment analysis to refine web quality metrics. In: processings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2005, Regensburg Germany, May 26-28.

    6. Bigdeli, Z. & Abiari, A. (2013). Investigating the relationship between Information Literacy and Library Anxiety in the Graduate Students at Shahid chamran University. Studies on Library & Information Science, 5(11): 17-36. [In Persian]

    7. Biniyaz, H. (2013). The relationship between information literacy & computer self -efficacy & Academic performance of students in faculeties psycology and education of Tehran university. Masters dissertation. Tehran: University of Tehran, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences. [In Persian]

    1. 8.  Ebrahimi, B. (2012). Determining the level of users' satisfaction with the efficiency of Ahlul Bayt (AS) Digital Library of Isfahan. Masters dissertation. Tehran: University ofAllameh Tabatabai, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences.[In Persian]

    9. Emmett, A. & Emde, J. (2007). Assessing information literacy skills using the ACRL standards as a guide. Reference Services Review, 35(2): 210-229. 

    10. Fattahi, R.A. (2000). A Model for Reviewing and Restructuring Library and Information Education in Iran with Regard to New Developments in the Information Environment. Library and Information Science, 1(13):21-44. [In Persian]

    11. Finley, M. (2009). Alvin Toffler and the Third Wave. Retrieved from:

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show /67282/Third-Wave-Alvin-Toffler/

    12. Ghasemi, P. & Noruzi, A.R. (2016). An Investigation into Teacher's Information Literacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 50(1): 6-66. [In Persian]

    13. Green, D. & Kyrillidou, M. (2012). Libqual + Procedure Manual. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Library Assessment Conference. Washingtone, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Retrieved from:

    https://www.libqual.org/documents/LibQual/publications/ProceduresManual.pdf.

    14. Guder, C.S. (2012). Exploring the Relationship between Patron Type, Carnegie Classification, andSatisfaction with Library Services: An Analysis of LibQUAL+® Results. Doctoral dessertation ofPhilosophy. The Patton College of Education at Ohio University.

    15. Hasanzadeh, M. & Najafgholi nezhad, A. (2009). Assessment and evaluation of libraries and information centers. Tehran: ketabdar publication. [In Persian]

    16. Hasanzadeh, M. (2004). Application of information literacy components in the organization's knowledge management. In: Proceedings of the Conference on User Training and Development of Information Literacy in Libraries, Information Centers and Museums. Mashhad: Organization of Libraries, Museums and Documentation Center of Astan Quds Razavi. [In Persian]

    17. Ilieska, K. (2013). Customer Satisfaction Index – as a Base for Strategic Marketing Management. TEM Journal, 2(4): 327-331.

    18. Kamaruddin, N.A. ; Baharuddin, M.F. & Mustaffar, M.Y. (2014). Assessment of service quality using LibQUAL+ three key dimensions tool at public libraries in Klang Valley, Malaysia. In:23rd International Business Information Management Association Conference. IBIMA 2014; Valencia; Spain; 13 May 2014 through 14 May 2014.

    19. Kargar Azad, Z. (2015). The Classification of Webqual Dimensions Based on the Asymmetric Impactperformance of Kano's Customer Satisfaction Model: A Case Study of Tehran Virtual University Website. Masters dissertation. Tehran: university of Tehran, Faculty of Library and Information scence. [In Persian]

    20. Kavoosi, M.R. & Saghai, A. (2013). The methods of measuring Customer satisfaction. Tehran: Ameh. [In Persian]

    21. Kyrillidiu, M. & Macial, M. (2015). LibQUAL+ Survey Introduction. In: Library Assessment Conference 2015. Washingtone, Association of Research Libraries & Texas A &M University Libraries. Retrieved from:

    https://www.libqual.org/documents/LibQual/publications/2015/2015_ALA_Chicago_SurveyIntro.pdf

    22. Leichner, N.PJ. ; Mayer, A. & Krampen, G. (2013). Assessing information literacy among German psychology students. Reference Service Review, 41(4): 660-674, retrieved from:

    www.emeraldinsight.com/0090-7324.htm

    23. Miller, K.F. (2008). Service Quality In Academic Libraries: An Analysis Of Libqual+™ Scores and InstiTtutional Characteristics. Doctoral dissertation of Education. The College of Education, at the University of Central Florida. Retrieved from:  purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/CFE0002007.

    24. Moein, M. (1995). The role of information in research and development. Journal of Information Science, 11(1): 3-5. [In Persian]

    25. Napitupulu, D. (2017). Analysis of factors affecting the website quality based on webqual approach (study case: XYZ university). International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 7(3): 791-798, Retrieved from:10.18517/ijaseit.7.3.1748.

    26. Nickpour, A. & Manzari Tavakkoli, A.R. & Rajaei Nejad, M. (2011). The Relationship between Employees’ Information Literacy and Organizational Effectiveness in Kerman's Public Organizations. Journal of Management and Development Process, 25(3) :145-161. [In Persian]

    27. Niyakan Lahiji, N. (2012). Investigation of Factors Affecting Customers' Satisfaction in Life Insurance. World Insurance News, 174: 4-18. [In Persian]

    28. Parasuraman, A. ; Zeithaml, V.A. & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: a multiple item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3):231-234.

    29. Parirokh, M. (2007). Information literacy training: concepts, methods and programs. Tehran: Ketabdar. [In Persian]

    30. Pekari, C. (2005). Human rights in the information society. Retrieved from: www.esil-sedi.eu/sites/default/files/Pekari_0.PDF.

    31. Pinto, M. ; Antonio, C.J. & Gomez, D.R. (2010). Thirty years of Thirty years of information literacy (1977—2007).  Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 42(1): 3–19.

    32. Razmi shendi, M. ; Esfandyari moghaddam, A.R. & Noruzi, Y. (2013). Evaluating the quality  services provided by the library and information center of Imam Sadegh University using Libqual model. Information systems and services, 2(4): 69-80. [In Persian]

    33. Shabani, A .(2008). Investigating the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Quality of Providing Library Service among Faculty Librarians at University of Tehran. Masters dissertation. Tehran: University of Tehran, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Department of Library and Information science. [In Persian] 

    34. Siyamak, M. & Davarpanah, M. (2009). Development and validation of basic and real information literacy assessment for undergraduate students.The journal of library and information science, 2(1):119-146. [In Persian]

    35. Taherian, A. (2007). Factors affecting library users' satisfaction specially in special libraries. National Studies on  Librarianship and Information Organization, 70:179-196. [In Persian]

    36. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2010). Towards media and information literacy indicators. Background Document of the Expert Meeting 4-6 November, Bangkok, Thailand,  Prepared by Moeller, S. ; Joseph, A. ; Lau, J. & Carbo, T. Retrieved from: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/education-building-blocks/literacy.

    37. Voorbij, H. (2012). The use of LibQUAL+ by European research libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 13(3):154-168.  

    38. Yousef Zadeh Njdi Tabriz, A. (2013). Evaluating Electronic service Quality in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad from Their Higher Education Users and Library Staff Perspectives by an integrated Model Based upon Libqual, Digiqual & E-S qual. Masters dissertation.Mashhad:  Ferdowsi University, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences. [In Persian]

CAPTCHA Image