Instructor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.





1. Asnafi, A. (2015). Reviewing Shahid Beheshti University Scholars’ Presence in ResearchGate. Human Information Interaction,2(3):61-70.[In Persian]
2. Azadi Ahmadabadi, G. & Riahinia , N. (2017). Information management in two Social  Bookmarking Websites: Citeulike and Bibsonomy. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization,28(2):177-199. [In Persian]
3. Bilal, D. & Bachir, I. (2007). Children’s interaction with internationaland multilingual digital libraries. I. Understanding interface designrepresentations. Information Processing & Management,43(1): 47-64.
4. Craven, J.; Johnson, F. & Butters, G. (2010). The usability and  functionality of an online catalogue. Retrieved from:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00012531011015217/full/html.
5. Erfanmanesh, M. ;Asnai, A. & Arshadi, H. (2015). Iranian universities and research institutions in the ResearchGate: An altmetric study. Quarterly Journal of Knowledge Studies,8(30): 59-72.[In Persian]
6. Eskandari, F. & Hasanzadeh, M. (2014). User Interface and Search Capability Of Slamic Sciences Databases: Surveying Users as Experinces. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization,25(3):111-127.[In Persian]
8. Functionalities: an analytical comparison. Online Information Review,33(5):901-919.
9. Ghaforian, S. (2011).The Evaluation of the user's satisfaction from Namayeh database in the Central Library of Ferdowsi University from the viewpoint of students based on the Heuristic evaluation method. Library and Information Science,14(4): 163 -188. [In Persian]
10. Hasanzadeh, M. & Sohrabzadeh, S. (2013). Evaluation of user interface of Iranian Children National Library in terms of meeting general and specialized criteria. Journal of information Systems and Services,2(1), 1-12.[In Persian]
11. Khalili, L. (2016).Participation of Iranian Medical Universities in ResearchGate. Health Inf Manage,13(4):273-279. [In Persian]
12. Memar, N. & Baji, F. & Hosseinzadeh, F. (2018). Surveying Relationship Between use Of the Researchgate Network and Social Capital Of Faculty Members Of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science,25(23):15-26.[Persian]
13. Mirzaei, M. & Rahimi, S. & Moradi, M. (2016).A Survey on the Roll of Social Networks on Scientific Exchanges (Case study:Master's). Library and Information Sciences,19(1):108-130.[In Persian]
14. Naseri, Z. & Noruzi, A. & Nakhoda, M. (2016). Investigating User Interfaces of Non-Iranian Digital Libraries based on Social Bookmarking Capabilities and Characteristics to Use by Iranian Digital Libraries. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management,31(4):911-930.[In Persian]
15. Norouzi,Y. & Hariri, N. (2009). Determining Criteria for Evaluating the Inteface of Digital Libraries:A textual Research Approach. Library and Information Sciences,12(3):281-300.[In Persian]
16. Norouzi,Y. & Motazhari, S. (2015).Evaluation of User Interfaces of Selected National Digital Libraries: Suggestions for the Iranian National Digital Library. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization,25(4): 7-20.[In Persian]
17. Norouzi,Y. (2010). Investigating the Level of Observing the Evaluation Criteria for User Interface in Farsi Web Pages of Iranian Self-made and Purchased Digital Libraries. Research on Information Science and Public Libraries,16(3):169-189. [In Persian]
18. 18. Ross, J. & Gao, J. (2015).  Overcoming the language barrier in mobile user interface design: A case study on a mobile health app. Australasian Conference on Information Systems Ross & Gao 2015, University of South Australia, Adelaide Overcoming culture barrier in health app design. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org › feeb.
19. Saljoughi, E.; Aghasi, N.; Asadi, M. & Okhovati, M. (2016). Evaluating the User Interface of Health Literacy Websites in Iran. Health Inf Manage,13(2):108-113.[In Persian]
20. Sharifmoghaddam, H. & Miri, A. & Salami, M. (2018). Activity of Faculty Members in Scientific Social Networks: Fields, Requirements, Barriers, and Factors Affecting. National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization, 29(3): 153-171. [In Persian]
21. Shiri, A. (2009). An examination of social tagging interface features and functionalities: An analytical comparison. Online Information Review, 33(5):901-919.                https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520911001909.
22. Siamaki, S.; Geraei & E. & Zare-Farashbandi, F. (2016). A Survey on the Presence of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Researchers in ResearchGate Network: An Altmetrics Study. Health Inf Manage, 13(5):341-346. [Persian]
23. Sotodeh, H. & Saadat, Y. (2015). Surveying the Iranian Chemists’ Attitude toward Membership in Social Research Networks. Human Information Interaction,2(3):1-12.[In Persian]
24. Yushiana, M. ; Abdul Rani, W. (2007). Heuristic evaluation ofinterface usability for a web-based OPAC. Library Hi Tech,25 (4):538 – 549.