Evaluation of knowledge management criteria in the website of govenmental universities in Tehran based on the K-ACT model: Case studies of Tehran University website, Tarbiat Modares and Allameh Tabatabai

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master of Information Science and Knowledge, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Aim:The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the websites of three universities of Tehran, Tarbiat Modares and Allameh Tabataba'i based on knowledge management criteria, Cactect Model.
Methodology: The present study has been conducted in terms of applied purpose and survey-evaluation method.
Findings: The website of the University of Tehran is in the first place in the component of accessibility of knowledge with 72.8% of the score and the websites of Tarbiat Modares and Allameh Tabatabai universities are in the second place with 63.4% each in this component. In terms of knowledge creation, Tarbiat Modares University website is in the first place with 83.3%, Allameh Tabatabai University website is in the second place with 50% and Tehran University website is in the third place with 33.3%. In terms of knowledge dissemination, the website of Tarbiat Modares University is in the first place with 86.3%, the Website of Allameh Tabatabai University is in the second place with 54.5% and the website of the University of Tehran is in the third place with 50%. In general, in this model (which includes three components of accessibility, creation and dissemination of knowledge), the website of Tarbiat Modares University with 76% of points is ranked first, the websites of University of Tehran and Allameh Tabatabai are also ranked second with 58% of the score.
Conclusion:The results of the present study indicate that although the websites of the study population appeared above the average in terms of knowledge management criteria, there is still a gap to reach the desired point and there are still many weaknesses in using new technologies, and in particular website in Iran.. Although steps have been taken in this regard, the use of expert opinions on the one hand and the surveys of website users on the other hand can be helpful and effective in this regard.
 
 

Keywords


Ables, E.G.; White, M.D. & Hahn, K. (1999). A user-based design process for web site. OCLC System & Services, 15(1): 35-44.
Ameli, S.R. (2013). Research methods in cultural and media studies. Tehran: University of Tehran, Second Edition. [In Persian]
Behzadi, H. & Majideh S. (2009). Investigating the level of accessibility and creation and dissemination of knowledge in the portals of the ministries of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Journal of Science, Technology and Information. 27(1): 27-5. [In Persian]
Davenport, T.H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Ghaneh, M.R. (1390). Website evaluation system of the universities of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education and the Islamic Azad University. Shiraz: Persepolis. [In Persian]
GharibeNyazi, M. (2013). Evaluating the websites of Iranian Government Universities with two methods: WebQM and web evaluator profile and comparing their results. Master Thesis in Information Science. Tehran: Al-Zahra University. [In Persian]
Goh, D. & et al. (2007). Knowledge access, creation and transfer in e-government portals. Online information review, 32(3): 348-369.
Hamdipour, A. (2011). Evaluate the website of the libraries of the medical universities of the country and provide suggestions for improving their situation. Health Information Management, 8(2): 13-1. [In Persian]
Kennedy, P. (2006). Accessibility tips for website construction. Available from:
URL: http://www.steptwo.comau/papers/kmc accessibility tips/index.html
Mahdavizadeh, A. (2015). Assessing the quality of university websites based on web use exploration technique (Case study: Semnan University website. Master Thesis. Industrial Management. Semnan: Semnan University. [In Persian]
Mohsenzadeh, F & . Behzadi, H. (2012). Evaluation of websites of units in regions 7, 14 and 15 of Islamic Azad University in terms of compliance with knowledge management criteria
(k-ACT model). Quarterly Journal of Science (Library and Information Science and Information Technology), 19(5): 116-136. [In Persian]
Morrison, A.M.; Taylor, J.S. & Douglas, A. (2005). Website evaluation in Tourism and hospitality: the art is not yet stated. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 17(2-3): 233-251.
Nadi Ravandi, S.; Djanavi, E.; Abbasi, S. & Gilasi, H.R. (2014). Analysis and Evaluation of the World's Top Hospital Portals from the Perspective of Internet-based Knowledge Management Model Retrieved from K-ACT Model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147: 47-55.
Nah, F.; Siau, K. & Tian, Y. (2005). Knowledge management mechanisms of financial service sites. Communications of the ACM, 48(6):117-123.
Raward, R. (2001). Academic Library Website Design Principles: Development of a Cheklist. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 32(2).
Sandvig, J. & Bajwa, D. (2004). Information seeking on universities websites: An exploratorystudy. The journal of computer information systems, 45(10): 13-22 .
Tierney, R.J. & et al. (2003). Interactive assessment: Teachers, parents, and students as partners. Norwood, Mass: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
Tung, F.C. & Chang, S.C. (2008). Nursing students behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey. International journal of nursing studies, 45(9): 1299- 1309.
Zahedi, SH. (1388). Website quality evaluation; Tools and criteria. Journal of Development and Transformation Management, 2(4): 16-5. [In Persian]
CAPTCHA Image