Legal Challenges of Online Digital Libraries

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Social Sciences, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

10.22091/stim.2021.7106.1609

Abstract

Aim: Digitization is a way to better organize and present information that will make it easier for the general public to access it. Nevertheless, intellectual property rights based on author-centered perspectives pose challenges for libraries; To the extent that today it is a necessity to say that these rights need an intellectual revolution to always ensure a balance between the rights of the owners of works and society.
Traditionally, when a library buys a book from a publisher, according to the "first sale or exhaustion" theory, the purchased copy is no longer subject to copyright control rules. Lending books in libraries is based on exactly the same legal basis. But this basis is not very effective in lending books to e-libraries. So from the point of view of some, At present, copyright law presupposes the or exhaustion of rights only to tangible objects, such as printed books, and vice versa; The status of digital works is ambiguous. The main goal of the present research is to resolve these ambiguities as much as possible by categorizing the sources.
Methodoligy: This research is practical in terms of purpose and qualitative-descriptive in terms of the method of data collection and analysis.
Findings: Books and digital works Digital libraries are divided into three categories in terms of the status of publishing rights and especially the legal status of access to them; First, copyrighted works (sponsored); Second, Orphan Works And finally, Out-Of-Print Works. The solution that strengthens digital libraries is to assign Orphan and Out-Of-Print Works to the public domain. The transformation of these works as part of public ownership does not sever the connection of the work with its creator, and in fact, these works generally have a family and this family (society) will enjoy it and benefit from its benefits.
Conclusion: The existence of a comprehensive regulatory framework supporting online digital libraries and protecting and expanding public knowledge and awareness is a fundamental need and necessity. Today, digital libraries are considered the main means of access to knowledge and awareness, and removing monopolies and enriching digital libraries is very decisive in this field.
It is necessary to review the strict laws of authors' rights in favor of the production of knowledge and information and public culture, as well as the expansion of copyright laws in order to help the production of knowledge, information and culture. Many legal proposals have been submitted to resolve the issue of copyrighted works. These proposals include, Legislative amendment of copyright law, special library exemption and Courts’ intervention to uphold digital exhaustion.
 

Keywords


Abdullah, A.B. (2020). Orphan Works Situation Under Canadian Copyright Act. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 95.
Bagheri, M. & Ahadzadeh, A. (2013). The ability to apply the theory of public interest analysis in intellectual property rights infringement lawsuits. Private Law Studies, 44(2), 137-154.
[in persian]
Chiarizio, M. (2013). An American tragedy: e-books, licenses, and the end of public lending libraries?. Vanderbilt Law Review, 66(2), 615-644.
Fishman, S. (2021). The Copyright Handbook What Every Writer Needs to Know. NOLO, 14th edition.
Fontanin, M. & Castellucci, P. (2019). Water to the Thirsty Reflections on the Ethical Mission of Libraries and Open Access. In: 15th Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries, IRCDL 2019, Pisa, Italy, January 31 – February 1, 2019, Proceedings.
Goldstein, P. & Hugenholtz, B (2013). International Copyright, Principles, Law and Practice. Oxford University Press (3rd ed.).
Hansen, D. (2011). Orphan Works: Definitional Issues, Berkley Digital Library Copyright Project White Paper #1. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1974614
Heald, P. (2014). The public domain. In: R. WATT (ed.). The Law and Economics of Copyright Routledge. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2362983
Hickey, K. (2020). COVID-19 and Libraries: E-Books and Intellectual Property Issues. Available at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10453
Huang, O. (2006). U.S. Copyright Office Orphan Works. Berkley Technology Law Journal, 21, 265.
Landes, W.M. & Posner, R.A. (2003). The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press.
Mezei, P., Hajdú, D. & Capote-Pérez, L. (2018). Introduction to Digital Copyright Law. Third Edition, Hungary, Iurisperitus Kiadó.
Mirhosseini, S.H. (1385). The culture of intellectual property rights. Tehran: Mizan, Vol.2. [in persian]
Muller, H. (2012). Legal aspects of e-books and interlibrary loan. Interlending & Document Supply, 40(3), 150-155.
Mwim, O. & Pistorius, T. (2017). Review of legal philosophical approach to digital copyright management and its implications for knowledge degeneration in Africa. In: 2017 Computing Conference. London: United Kingdom, pp. 1029-1034.       
DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2017.8252076
O’Brein, D., Gasser, U. & Palfrey, J. (2012). E-Books in Libraries: A Briefing Document Developed in Preparation for a Workshop on E-Lending in Libraries. Berkman Center Research Publication.
Panezi, A. (2014). Legal Challenges for Online Digital Libraries. Journal promoted by the Law and Political Science Department, 19, 18-34.
Perzanowski, A. & Schultz, J. (2011). Digital Exhaustion. UCLA Law Review, 58, 889-946.
Pistorius, T. & Mwim, O. (2019). The impact of digital copyright law and policy on access to knowledge and learning. Reading & Writing, 10(1), a196.       
DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4102/rw.v10i1.196.
Reese, R. (2003). The first sale doctrine in the era of digital networks. Boston College Law Review, 44(9), 577.
Samuelson, P. (2009). Google Book Search and the future of Books in Cyberspace. Minnesotta Law Review, 94, 1308.
Shakri, Z. (2014). fair use of literary and artistic works; A right for society?! Private Law Studies, 45(2), 207-223. [in persian]
Smith, M., Telang, R. & Zhang, Y. (2012). Analysis of the Potential Market for Out-of-Print eBooks. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2141422
US Cipyright Office (2011). Legal issues in Mass Digitization: a preliminary analysis and discussion document. Office of the register of copyrights. Available at:             
http://www.copyright.gov/docs/massdigitization/ USCOMassDigitization_October2011.pdf
Vancauwenbergh, S. (2021). Digital Libraries: Advancing Open Science. London: Intechopen.
CAPTCHA Image