Measuring Inter-Organizational Interactions of Scientific Articles in the Electrical and Electronic Engineering Field in Iran through a Triple Helix Model Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master's Student, Department of Scientometrics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: The triple helix model measures the interactions between university, industry, and government and is used by researchers as a normative framework to understand the interactions between the main actors in innovation systems. The main goal of the current research is to analyze the dynamics of organizational interactions in the production of scientific articles in the field of electrical and electronic engineering in Iran. Therefore, this research tries to quantitatively assess the status of inter-organizational cooperation in scientific articles in the field of electrical and electronic engineering in Iran with the approach of the triple helix model.
Method: The current research is of an applied type, which was conducted using the Triple Helix Model and based on the T(UIG) indicator for University-Industry-Government interactions. The statistical population of the research includes 19,802 scientific articles indexed in the Web of Science database, from Iran in the field of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, during 2010-2019. TH software was used to convert data that was extracted from the Web of Science database into Excel format and to calculate the uncertainty of the interactions of the elements. In order to make a proper analysis in this regard, first, based on the usual and common research process of this field, the university was considered with code U, the industry with code I, and the government with code G.
Findings: The findings of the research showed that the number of articles has grown in the studied period and reached 3216 articles in 2019 from 1019 articles in 2010. The findings show that the production of articles in all three pillars has an upward growth and the growth rate of articles from 2010 to 2019 is 0.63 for university, 2.5 for industry and 1.8 for government; On the other hand, the highest level of cooperation between the university and the industry has taken place, and the lowest level of cooperation has been between the government and the industry. The findings showed that the highest level of university-government interactions was in 2010 and the lowest level of government-industry interactions, which was close to zero in most years, indicating the independence and lack of connection between the mentioned elements. One of the remarkable results is that in the years 2010-2019, the interaction between the university and the industry was in contrast with the dual interaction between the university and the government. University-industry interaction has been aligned with industry-government interaction during the years under review. In 2014, the interaction between the dual and triple pillars was zero, while the university-industry interaction reached its highest level this year. Also, in 2014, the highest level of interaction between university-industry dual pillars has taken place, and the opposite is true for tripartite relationships, and in 2010, the highest degree of triple interaction between university-industry-government pillars is observed. Based on the values of T index, the highest amount of double and triple interactions between university-government, university-industry-government, university-industry, and industry-government have been seen, respectively. In 2014, the interaction of the dual and triple pillars was close to zero, but this year, the interaction between the university and the industry has increased a lot, which indicates that the government does not invest in the industry, and in other words, wherever the role of the government becomes weaker, The role of industry is more prominent.
Conclusion: The findings showed that the number of articles has grown in the studied period, reaching 3216 articles in 2019 from 1019 articles in 2010. The results also show that the production of articles in all three pillars has an upward growth which the growth rate of articles from 2010 to 2019 is 0.63 for universities, 2.5 for industry, and 1.8 for government; On the other hand, the highest level of cooperation between the university and the industry has taken place, and the lowest level of cooperation has been between the government and the industry. The findings showed that the highest level of university-government interactions was in 2010, and the lowest level of government-industry interactions was close to zero in most years, indicating the independence and lack of connection between the mentioned elements. One of the remarkable results is that in the years 2010-2019, the interaction between the university and the industry was in contrast with the dual interaction between the university and the government. University-industry interaction has been aligned with industry-government interaction during the years under review. In 2014, the interaction between the dual and triple pillars was zero, while the university-industry interaction reached its highest level this year. Also, in 2014, the highest level of interaction between university-industry dual pillars has been taken place, and the opposite is true for tripartite relationships. In 2010, the highest degree of triple interaction between university-industry-government pillars is observed. Based on the values of the T index, the highest amount of double and triple interactions between university-government, university-industry-government, university-industry, and industry-government have been seen, respectively. In 2014, the interaction of the dual and triple pillars was close to zero, but this year, the interaction between the university and the industry has increased a lot, which indicates that the government does not invest in the industry, and in other words, wherever the role of the government becomes weaker, The role of industry is more prominent.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Amirinia, H. & Baitab, A. (2016). Optimal model of relationship between government, industry and university studied by the experiences of the Office of Technology Cooperation in the country. Journal of Industry and University, 49(3): 413-38.
Azizi, F. & Moradi, F. (2019). Investigating the relation between the university, industry and government in the innovation system of the knowledge-based economy in Iran. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM), 17(2).
Bagheri Nejad, J. (2004). Interaction of Scientific and Industrial Sectors as a Platform for Technology Development. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 6(22): 1-30. [in persian] https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2004.2136
Cai, Y. & Etzkowitz, H. (2020). Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix, 1(aop): 1-38.
Choi, S., Yang, J.S.W. & Park, H.W. (2015). Quantifying the Triple Helix relationship in scientific research: Statistical analyses on the dividing pattern between developed and developing countries. Quality and Quantity, 49(4): 1381-1396.
Dehghani Sanij, S., Mostafavi, I., Zarghami, H.R., Soleimani H. (2021). Measuring the Interactions of ‎University, Industry and Government of Iran in Scientific Articles of Biomedical Engineering Field ‎Using the Triple Helix Model. Payavard Salamat, 14(5): 454-464. [in persian]
Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities in the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of academic–industry–government relations. Cassel.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action. New York/London: Routledge.
Hatami, M. & Naghshineh, N. (2015). Quantitative analysis and visualizaton of interorganizational of collaborations in Islamic Republic of Iran's indexed documents in Scopus: According to Triple Helix model. Scientometrics Research Journal, 1(1): 69-92. [in persian]      
https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2015.376
Hatami, M. (2016). Inter-institutional collaboration of Iranian patents indexed in international patent databases. Scientometrics Research Journal, 2(4): 39-48. [in persian]               
https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2016.491
Hossain, M.D., Moon, J., Kang, H., Lee, S. & Choe, Y. (2012). Mapping the dynamics of knowledge base of innovations of R&D in Bangladesh: triple helix perspective. Scientometrics, 90(1): 57-83. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20080840.1395.9.3.7.3
Ivanova, I., Strand, O. & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). What Is the Effect of Synergy Provided by International Collaborations on Regional Economies? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(1): 18-34.
Jafari, M., Akhavan, P. & Zarghami, H.R. (2015). Measuring the relationships among ‎university, industry and government in ‎Nano sector ‎using triple helix model. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 49(3): 413-438. [in persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2015.58107
Jafari, M., Zarghami, H.R., Akhavan, P. (2015). Measuring synergy in scientific and technological ‎collaborations using triple helix indicators (case study: Iranian ‎Nano ISI papers)‎. Journal of Technology Development Management, 3(3): 55-79. [in persian]          
https://doi.org/10.22104/jtdm.2016.376
Jowkar, T. & Morovati, M. (2016). Triple helix of University-Industry- Government in the Scientific Articles of Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 9(3): 71-84. [in persian]
Jowkar, T. & Osareh, F. (2022). Flow of Scientific Publications in Iran during 2007 to 2011, Based on Triple Helix of University, Industry and Government. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 29(2): 505-533. [in persian]
Kang, W., Zhao, S., Song, W. & Zhuang, T. (2019). Triple helix in the science and technology innovation centers of China from the perspective of mutual information: a comparative study between Beijing and Shanghai. Scientometrics. 118(3): 921-940.
Kim, H., Huang, M., Jin, F., Bodoff, D., Moon, J. & Choe, Y. C. (2012). Triple helix in the agricultural sector of Northeast Asian countries: a comparative study between Korea and China. Scientometrics, 90(1): 101-120.
Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3): 195–203.
Leydesdorff, L. (2001). The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications. Universal Publishers, Parkland, Florida:
1-25.
Leydesdorff, L., Park, H. & Lengyel, B. (2014). A routine for measuring synergy in university–industry– government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator. Scientometrics, 99(1): 27-35.
Long, M. (Ed.). (2013). World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering May
26-31, 2012. Beijing, China (Vol. 39). Springer Science & Business Media.
Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers, 4(11): 95-119.
Mêgnigbêto, E. (2018). Modelling the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships with game theory: core, Shapley value and nucleolus as indicators of synergy within an innovation system. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4): 1118–1132.
Mohammad Pour, F. (2014). Explaining the prerequisites and infrastructures for the production and commercialization of knowledge and innovation for the realization of a knowledge-based economy. Master's thesis. Kermanshah: Razi University. [in persian]
Osareh, F. & Mustafavi, I. (2001). Scientific outputs of Iranian authors in the field of science and nanotechnology. Library and Information Science Studies, 1-17(5): 3-28. [in persian]
Shin, J.C., Lee, S.J. & Kim, Y. (2012). Knowledge-based innovation and collaboration: a triple-helix approach in Saudi Arabia. Scientometrics, Springer; Akadémiai Kiadó, 90(1): 311-326.
Sobhani, A.R. & Tajali, M.R. (2012). The Study of Resources Needed to Strengthen the Role of the University in National Innovation System from the Professors’ Viewpoints in Semnan University. Educational Administration Research, 3(12): 149-176. [in persian]
Sobhani, F., Ebrahimi, S. & Jowkar, A. (2023). Scientific interactions between university, industry and government in the field of agriculture in Iran: based on Triple Helix Model. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 23(3): 21-41. [in persian]
Souzanchi Kashani, E. & Zarghami, H.R. (2019). The dynamics of university-industry-government relationships in Nanoscience: investigating the Triple-Helix differences between Iran and Switzerland. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(7): 817-832.
Sun, Y. & Negishi, M. (2010). Measuring the relationships among university, industry and other sectors in Japan’s national innovation system: a comparison of new approaches with mutual information indicators. Scientometrics, 82(3): 677-685.
Ye, F.Y., Yu, S.S. & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). The Triple Helix of universityindustry-government relationsat the country level, and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(11): 2317-2325. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22931
 
CAPTCHA Image