Postdoctoral Position in Iran Compared to Other Selected Countries

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD., Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Research Group on Financing and Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, National Research Institute for Science Policy, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Science and Research Policy Research, National Research Institute for Science Policy, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Every year, a significant number of young individuals in the country obtain specialized doctorate degrees, and their main concern after graduation is finding a job that aligns with their expertise. One of the anticipated roles for these graduates is to join universities, educational institutions, and research centers as academic staff. Offering post-doctoral courses as short-term programs not only creates a platform for conducting research but also enhances employment opportunities for PhD graduates upon completion of these courses. This article aims to elucidate the initiatives undertaken by the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology (MSRT) and various universities and research institutes in organizing post-doctoral programs. Additionally, it examines the approaches and performance of other countries in this regard.
Method: The research methodology employed in this study includes surveys and document reviews. Additionally, it examines the approaches and performance of other countries in this regard. The research methodology employed in this study includes surveys and document reviews. To examine the role of post-doctoral positions, four key upstream documents were analyzed: the Law of the Fifth Five-Year Plan for National Development, the Law of the Sixth Five-Year Plan for National Development, the Comprehensive Scientific Map of the Country, and the document on the Transformation of the People's Government (Thirteenth Government), along with the programs proposed by the honorable minister. It involved science, research, and technology. Additionally, to evaluate the scientific outcomes of implementing these regulations in the country's universities and research institutes, a monitoring plan was executed. This plan included gathering information on post-doctoral researchers working in 46 universities and government research institutes by completing their profiles in the system.
Findings: The document review revealed that the term "post-doctorate" is used in only three instances: specifically, in the 12th row of the national action plan of the 6th grand strategy of the comprehensive scientific map of the country, the 9th transformative strategy, and the 18th grand plan proposed by the highest authority of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology, which has been directly referenced in the 13th government. In all other cases, the term is mentioned more generally, often in the context of phrases such as independent researchers, researchers, postgraduates, elites, and similar terms. The Ministry of Honors has taken significant steps by drafting two key documents: the "Regulations for the Admission of Postdoctoral Researchers" and the "Regulations for the Recruitment and Employment of Postdoctoral Researchers. However, the acceptance rate for conducting courses at universities and institutions has been less than ideal due to limited financial resources. As a result, in 2022, only 879 postdoctoral researchers (516 women and 363 men) were recruited across 42 universities and 4 government research institutes. In examining the status of postdoctoral researchers by gender, it was found that a substantial number of postdoctoral researchers in 2023 were women, comprising 58.7 percent, which is a significant percentage compared to men at 41.3 percent. Additionally, the highest number of post-doctoral researchers was observed in the fields of basic sciences (359 individuals), technical and engineering disciplines (269 individuals), and humanities (146 individuals), respectively.
Conclusion: On one hand, the annual graduation of nearly ten thousand specialized doctorate holders, along with a substantial number of academic staff members holding the rank of associate professor and professor, indicates a significant capacity for conducting post-doctoral programs in the country. However, challenges such as insufficient funding and a lack of necessary credits for research have led to the neglect of this issue. Therefore, allocating appropriate, targeted, and well-planned financial resources can enhance the country's scientific output in specialized fields while creating a conducive environment for attracting more PhD graduates.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Åkerlind, G.S. (2005). Postdoctoral researchers: roles, functions and career prospects. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1): 21-40. ‏               https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318550
Baader, M.S., Böhringer, D., Korff, S. & Roman, N. (2017). Equal opportunities in the postdoctoral phase in Germany? European Educational Research Journal, 16(2-3): 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117694624
Bataille, P., Le Feuvre, N. & Kradolfer Morales, S. (2017). Should I stay or should I go? The effects of precariousness on the gendered career aspirations of postdocs in Switzerland. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2-3): 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116673372
Bessudnov, A., Guardiancich, I. & Marimon, R. (2015). A statistical evaluation of the effects of a structured postdoctoral programme. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9): 1588-1604. ‏              https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.899340
Conti, A. & Visentin, F. (2015). A revealed preference analysis of PhD students’ choices over employment outcomes. Research Policy, 44(10): 1931-1947.
Feldon, D.F., Litson, K., Jeong, S., Blaney, J.M., Kang, J. & Miller, C. (2019). Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42): 20910–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912488116
Göran, M. (2005). The dark side of mobility: negative experiences of doing a postdoc period abroad. Research Evaluation, 14(3): 229–237. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154405781776102
Gu, J., Levin, J.S. & Luo, Y. (2018). Reproducing, “academic successors” or cultivating “versatile experts”: Influences of doctoral training on career expectations of Chinese PhD students. Higher Education, no. 76: 427–447. https://doi. org/10. 1007/s10734-017-0218-x
Horta, H. (2009). Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise? High Educ, no. 58: 689–721. ‏            https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9221-1
Hu, D. (2021). Understanding Transnational Academic Migration: U.S. Doctorate Recipients’ Choices of Returning to Chinese Academe. Int J Educ Vocat Guidance, no. 21: 653–669. ‏      https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-021-09459-2
Huang, F. & Shen, W. (2019). What Determinants Affect Doctoral Students’ Career Plans? Main Findings from a 2018 Survey of Chinese Doctoral Students. International Journal of Chinese Education, 8(2): 99-116. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125868-12340108
Jiang, J. & Shen, W. (2019). International Mentorship and Research Collaboration: Evidence from European-Trained Chinese PhD Returnees. Front Educ China, no. 14: 180–205. ‏          https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0010-z
Jiang, J., Mok, K.H. & Shen, W. (2020). Riding over the National and Global Disequilibria: International Learning and Academic Career Development of Chinese Ph.D. Returnees. High Educ Policy, no. 33: 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00175-9
Jung, H., Yang, J.M. & Oh, Y.S. (2023). Influence of government-funded postdoctoral fellowships on tenure-track appointments of scholars in the social sciences and humanities. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. no. 24: 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09758-5
Jung, J. (2018). Domestic and overseas doctorates and their academic entry-level jobs in South Korea. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(2): 205-222.  
https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2017-0070
Kaur, J. & Singh, N. (2020). Why do Chinese international students’ study in Australia repatriate? Australian Chinese graduates tell it all. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9):
1207-1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1669771
Kellogg, R.P. (2012). China’s Brain Gain? Attitudes and Future Plans of Overseas Chinese Students in the US. Journal of Chinese Overseas, 8(1): 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1163/179325412X634319
Lee, S.J. & Shin, J.Ch. (2024). Postdoctoral researchers' experience and their career plan in a research-focused university in South Korea. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(2): 473-487.
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12459
Ma, Y. & Pan, S. (2015). Chinese Returnees from Overseas Study: An Understanding of Brain Gain and Brain Circulation in the Age of Globalization. Front Educ China, no. 10: 306–329.            
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03397067
Martinez, A., Epstein, C.S. & Parsad, A. (2016). Developing internationally engaged scientists and engineers: The effectiveness of an international postdoctoral fellowship program. Research Evaluation, 25(2): 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv042
Nachatar Singh, J.K. (2020). Challenges in obtaining employment in China: Lived experiences of Australian Chinese graduates. Australian Journal of Career Development, 29(3): 153-163.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416220947085
Nachatar Singh, J.K. (2020). Why do Chinese international students’ study in Australia repatriate? Australian Chinese graduates tell it all, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(9):
1207-1219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1669771
Nerad, M. & Cerny, J. (1999). Postdoctoral Patterns, Career Advancement, and Problems. SCIENCE, 285(5433): 1533-1535.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5433.1533
Prozesky, H. & van Schalkwyk, F. (2024). The profile of postdoctoral research fellows in South Africa: Trends over the past two decades. South African Journal of Science, 120(1/2).    
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2024/15898
Ramezani, M. & Ehteshamnejad, E. (2024). A set of regulations, guidelines, and executive instructions approved by the Deputy for Research of the Ministry of Science. Research, and Technology. NIRSP Pub. [in persian]
Rybarczyk, B., Lerea, L., Kay Lund, P., Whittington, D. & Dykstra, L. (2011). Postdoctoral Training Aligned with the Academic Professoriate. BioScience, 61(9): 699–705.         
https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.9.8
Skakni, I., Moreno, M.D.C.C., Corcelles Seuba, M. & McAlpine, L. (2019). Hanging tough: post-PhD researchers dealing with career uncertainty. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7): 1489-1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657806
Sun, T., Drane, D., McGee, R., Campa, H., Goldberg, B.B. & Hokanson, S. (2023). A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers. PLoS ONE, 18(6): 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275767
Tomlinson, M. (2008). The degree is not enough: students’ perceptions of the role of higher education credentials for graduate work and employability. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1): 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701737457
CAPTCHA Image