Designing a Knowledge-Based Internet Business Model for Knowledge Brokers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD. Student, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Humanities, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Humanities, Yadegar Imam Khomeini Shahr-e Ray Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Humanities, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: The present research aims to develop a knowledge-based internet business model for knowledge brokers.
Method: The current research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative techniques—specifically, the meta-synthesis method and the fuzzy Delphi method—with quantitative methods, including a survey-analytical approach. This exploratory study aimed to identify the components and indicators of knowledge-based internet businesses for knowledge brokers, utilizing the meta-synthesis method in the initial phase. The statistical population in this section comprises a substantial collection of 10,617 documents pertaining to the research topic, sourced from both domestic and international databases. From this collection, a selection of 65 documents specifically related to the research topic has been identified. The second part of this qualitative research utilized the fuzzy Delphi method and was conducted in two stages. The statistical population for the quantitative portion of the study consisted of 20 individuals who held doctoral degrees and were subject matter specialists with over five years of experience in knowledge management, technology management, and business. Initially, these individuals were targeted, and subsequently, they were selected using the snowball sampling method. Out of the 20, 10 participants responded to the questionnaire. The third part consists of a survey-analytical research study that quantitatively ranks and measures the status of the indicators obtained from the qualitative analysis. This is achieved through the method of structural equations, resulting in a model that will be evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis and presented with SmartPLS software. The statistical population for the quantitative portion of the research consisted of 155 technology and knowledge brokers supervised by the Presidential Vice President for Science and Technology, Iran's National Fan Market, and the Nanotechnology Exchange Network. These individuals were selected using a census method.
Findings: The knowledge-based internet business model for knowledge brokers consists of
three levels, encompassing nine dimensions and thirty components. These include various types of income models, pricing mechanisms, knowledge monitoring and evaluation, and coordination and communication between knowledge producers and end users. Additionally, the model addresses
the creation of knowledge and innovation, contract management, marketing, and the discovery
and understanding of market opportunities and needs. It also involves the search, acquisition, and collection of knowledge, as well as the establishment of legal infrastructure and human resource development. Key components include the application, availability, and storage of knowledge, the preparation of statistical and knowledge collections, and the identification and assessment of existing conditions. Furthermore, the model emphasizes the development of technical infrastructure and security, the integration, interpretation, and translation of knowledge, and the combination of research efforts. Networking is also a critical aspect, facilitating the sharing, transfer, and exchange of acquired knowledge. The model values knowledge by justifying its worth to customers and providing consulting services, while also offering value propositions to knowledge users, producers, and stakeholders. It encompasses human resources, funding, physical resources, and intellectual resources, as well as the roles of knowledge users and producers. The analysis reveals that the absolute value of the t-statistic exceeds 1.96, indicating a significant relationship between the components in the conceptual model of the research.
Conclusion: The knowledge-based internet business model, along with its functions and features, can play a vital role in today's competitive landscape by facilitating and accelerating the process of knowledge sharing. Meanwhile, knowledge brokers, as a type of mediator, facilitate the creation, sharing, and utilization of knowledge within an organization or among different organizations. By interpreting and analyzing data from various sources, knowledge brokers can offer valuable assistance to individuals and organizations in identifying the experiences and skills they require. The absence and ineffectiveness of knowledge brokers will disrupt the flow of information among individuals, organizations, and various businesses, leading to a significant information gap between them. The results of this research indicate that knowledge brokers can enhance the flow of information, foster communication between policymakers and researchers, transfer knowledge and experiences, and facilitate decision-making and policy development by implementing a clear and transparent business model. Investments in acquired knowledge can help increase the utilization of research in the policymaking process by leveraging useful, dispersed, and previously hidden information. This approach provides solutions to address problems and meet knowledge needs, accelerates the acquisition of products and services, and offers a platform for obtaining the necessary information in a safe, consistent, and reliable manner.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


AhmadPour Dariani, M. & Farokh Hayati, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship in Internet business. Tehran: Mehrab Ghalam. [in persian]
Boari, C. & Riboldazzi, F. (2014). How Knowledge Brokers Emerge and Evolve: The Role of Actors Behavior. Research Policy, no. 4: 695-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.007
Bonney, L. & et.al. (2022). The Salesperson as a kowledge broker: The effect of sales influence tactics on customer learning, purchase decision, and profitability. Industrial Marketing Management, vol 104: 352-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.05.001
Dalziel, M. (2010). Why do innovation intermediaries exist? Imperial college business school. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2630739
Dorudi, R. & et al. (2019). Identifying the knowledge gap regarding the challenges of the current payment system in Iran and proposing its reforms. National Institute of Health Research of Iran. [in persian]
Drew, H., Ritchie, F. & King, A. (2003). How do Knowledge brokers Work? The Case of WERS. Economics Working Paper Series, 13(3): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd.13.3.205_1
Gesualdo, N., Weber, M. & Yanovitzky, I. (2019). Journalists as Knowledge Brokers. Rutledge Taylor & Francis Group, 21(2): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1632734
Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5): 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
Hossein Gholizadeh, R. & Mirkamali, S.M. (2010). Key factors affecting knowledge sharing; A case study of Ferdowsi University Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology. Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Association of Iran, 3(1): 60-78. [in persian]
Hua Ye, J., Kankanhalli, A. & Yang, Z. (2010). Knowledge Brokering for Open Innovation: A Case Study of Innovation Intermediaries.Thirty Third International Conferece on Information System.
Jabari, N. & Madhoshi, M (2014). Dentifying factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior among faculty members of Gorgan universities. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 20(3). [in persian]
Jalili, S.M. (2016). Presenting a success model for startups in Iran using a system dynamics approach. Alzahra University. [in persian]
Kalabi, A., Yadolahi Farsi, J. & Azizi, M. (2021). Identifying and prioritizing the key success factors of the business model. Public management research, 14(54): 61-84. [in persian]
Lavis, J.N. (2006). Research, Public Policymaking, and Knowledge-Translation (processes: Canadian Efforts to Build Bridges). The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions,
vol. 26: 41. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.49.
Lesley, W. & et al. (2020). Collective Knowledge Brokering: The Model and Impact of an Embedded Team. A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 16(3): 429-457. 
https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15468577044957
Mackillop, E. & Downe, J. (2023). Knowledge brokering organisations: a new way of governing evidence. Evidence & Policy A journal of research, debate and practice, 19(1): 22-41.    
https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16445093010411
Mackillop, E., Quarmby, S. & Downe, J. (2020). Does Knowledge brokering facilitate evidence based policy? A review of existing kowledge and an agenda for future research. Policy & politics, 48(2): 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15740848311069
Masouri Moayed, F., KordHeydari, R. & Ghasemian Sahebi, A. (2020). The role of knowledge brokers in the development of the technical knowledge marketing model of knowledge-based companies. Management research in Iran, 24(2). [in persian]
Mohamadian, A. & Manian, A. & Khodad Barmi, M. (2016). Designing a virtual growth business model in Iran. Technology Growth Quarterly, 12(47): 1-11. [in persian]
MoradHasel, N. & and Mohamadian, A. (2015). The role of the government in the development of Internet business. Annual Conference on Business Management and Economics. 1-9. [in persian]
Morovati Sharifabadi, A. & Dehghan Menshadi, S. (2021). Growth and success of dynamic internet businesses. Modern Marketing Research Quarterly, 11(4): 191-201. [in persian]
Nasiri, M. & et.al. (2021). Presenting the internet shopping model in the field of small and medium online businesses from the perspective of entrepreneurs with a qualitative approach. The growth of technology, 68(17). [in persian]
Pawlowski, S. & Robey, D. (2004). Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals. Management Information Systems Research Center, 28(4): 645-672. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148658
Osterwalder, A. & Pingneur, Y. (2013). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for visionaries, Game Changers and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons: 1-288.
Rafie, Z. (2017). Factors and obstacles for knowledge sharing among teachers (Case study: Physics teachers of Neyshabur city. Psychological studies and educational sciences: 19-33. [in persian]
Rajabi, A. (2019). Starting a business online. Tehran: Supporting Publications. [in persian]
Scarlett, J. & et al. (2020) Indicators to evaluate organisational knowledge brokers: a scoping review. Health Res Policy Sys, 18(93). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00607-8
Sharon, J. & et al. (2021). Transfering, translating and transforming knowledge: the role of brokering in healthcare networks. Journal of health organization and management, 35(7).      
https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2021-0063
Smits, R. & Kuhlmann, S. (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and innovation policy, 1(1-2): 4-32.   
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621
Ukaj, F., Ramaj, V. & Livoreka, R. (2020). The impact of e-business on activity extension and business performance. Distribtion Science, 18(2): 103-112.   
https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.8.202008.103
Vaziri Godarzi, E. & Movahed Sobhani, F. (2014). Presenting a conceptual model to make the knowledge interface effective in the knowledge sharing process. Scientific-research journal of innovation management, 3(3): 101-120. [in persian]
Zahedi, M. & Javadi Kamani, S. (2018). Solutions to increase the productivity of human capital in teamwork. Standard and Quality Management Quarterly, 8(4): 64-75. [in persian]
 
 
CAPTCHA Image