Enhancing Capital Market Information Transparency in the Context of Corporate Anomalies

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD. Student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22091/stim.2024.9823.1999

Abstract

Purpose: One of the most effective tools in enhancing the efficiency of the capital market is transparency in information. A lack of transparency poses significant risks to investors. Effects of reduced transparency in capital information include fraudulent practices and inadequate financial reporting. This study aims to investigate the causes of anomalies in corporations and their impact on the transparency of capital market information.
Method: This research employs a qualitative approach grounded in the foundations of data theory. Qualitative data collection relies on a judicious selection of ten legal cases pertaining to the transgressions of stock companies adjudicated in the criminal courts of Tehran during the years 2013 to 2019. The purposive sampling technique is applied, and qualitative data analysis is executed through a systematic data plan grounded in foundational principles. Consequently, the elicited concepts undergo a multistage assessment encompassing open, axial, and selective coding.
Findings: The codes identified in relation to causal conditions are organized into four overarching categories, comprising 31 sub-categories. In the pursuit of elevating capital market transparency, mitigating impediments within the business milieu, minimizing government ownership, and rescinding obligatory market interventions, the identified causative factors are categorized into three primary domains, encompassing 25 sub-categories. These factors illuminate the inadequacy of punitive and repressive measures in curbing transgressions and irregularities within the stock and securities markets. Consequently, the implementation of proactive and deterrent mechanisms emerges as a fundamental instrument for enhancing capital market transparency. Underlying causes are classified into three primary categories, housing six sub-categories. These underpinning factors underscore the necessity of amalgamating education-driven and awareness-enhancing initiatives, with the objective of bolstering financial literacy and inculcating principles of equity ownership. Furthermore, these factors spotlight the importance of averting the characterization of individuals as malefactors in the capital market. Weaknesses in internal monitoring mechanisms, such as lapses in the appointment of internal auditors and audit committees, engender an environment conducive to fraudulent activities. This, in turn, results in a diminishment of financial reporting quality and a reduction in the transparency of information disclosed by corporate entities, thereby augmenting market risk.
Conclusion: The utilization of market regulation measures will significantly contribute to transparency in the capital market. This is because minimal and minimalistic criminal measures in the business sector not only prevent irregularities but also prevent the productive sectors of the economy from becoming inefficient.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abbaszadeh, M., Mohammadi, J., & Mohammadi, K. (2011). The necessity of internal controls in the public sector. Auditing Journal, No. 56. [in persian]
Aliya, A. (2014). Impact of corporate crime on developing capital markets: Case study of Nigeria. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences, No. 2: 186-196.
Arjmand Nejad, A. (2006). A framework for internal control systems in banking units. Tehran: Banking Supervision Committee Publications, Bank for International Settlements, Banking and Credit Studies Group, General Directorate of Bank and Credit Institutions Supervision. [in persian]
Carcello, J. & Neal, T. (2000). Audit committee characteristics and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4).
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: Sage, 2nd ed.
Cleff, T., Naderer, G. & Volkert, J. (2013). Motives behind white‐collar crime: Results of a quantitative and qualitative study in Germany. Society and Business Review, 8(2): 145-159.
Davidson, L.P. & Wilkins, M.S. (2001). The information content of withdrawn audit qualifications: new evidence on the value of subject-to opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2): 134-153.
Del Ashoob, S. (2016). Examination and strategies to prevent fraud in financial systems. In: Second International Conference on Accounting and Management in the Third Millennium. Rasht: Mirza Koochak Technical and Vocational University. [in persian]
Desai, R., Desai, V., Libby, T. & Srivastava, R.P. (2017). External auditors' evaluation of the internal audit function: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25: 1-12.
Flori, A.M. (1999). Transnational civil society. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.
Foroughi, D., Amiri, H. & Mirzaei, M. (2011). The impact of lack of financial information transparency on the future risk of stock price decline in listed companies. Financial Accounting Research, No. 3. [in persian]
Hajian, H. (2013). Fraud and the responsibilities of the audit committee. Auditor Journal, No. 64: 58. [in persian]
Hajiha, Z. & MohammadHossein Nejad, S. (2015). Factors affecting significant weaknesses in internal control. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 7(26). [in persian]
Hajiha, Z. & Moradian, B. (2014). Examination of information asymmetry and firm value on investment in Tehran Stock Exchange. Investment Knowledge, 3(12). [in persian]
Hekmat, S. (2013). The relationship between revenue growth discrepancies (financial criteria) and employee growth (non-financial criteria) with fraudulent financial reporting. Master's thesis. Shahid Beheshti University. [in persian]
Hematfar, M. & Moghaddassi, M. (2013). Examination of the quality of disclosure (reliability and timeliness) on the value of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Auditing and Accounting Reviews, 20(2). [in persian]
Hessas Yeganeh, Y., Osku, V. & Dagani, R. (2009). Fraud in companies: Who sounds the alarm? Accountant Quarterly, No. 6. [in persian]
Homan, H. (2015). A scientific guide to qualitative research. Tehran: SAMT Publications, 7th ed.
[in persian]
Hsiu, J.F. (2006). Effect of financial information transparency on investor behavior in Taiwan stock market. ProQuest Database, 16(3): 6-22.
Jafari, A. (2014). Business Criminal Law. Tehran: Shahre Danesh Publications. [in persian]
Kheradyar, S., Mohammadi Nodeh, F. & Haghighat Shahrestani, M. (2021). The impact of internal audit effectiveness and financial reporting quality on information asymmetry between manager and auditor. Accounting Advances Journal, 13(80). [in persian]
Mansourian, Y. (2011). A critique of the book "Qualitative Research: Studying What Happens. Ketab-e-Mah Kolliyat, 163: 57-60. [in persian]
Mehrabanpour, M. & Norizadeh, Z. (2018). Examination of the relationship between corporate governance structure and the probability of fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing and Accounting Research, No. 40. [in persian]
Najafi Tavana, A., Qorchi Beigi, M. & Karimi Eskayini, A. (2021). Qualitative analysis of corporate crimes in the stock market. Scientific Quarterly of Crime Prevention Approaches, No. 4.
[in persian]
Niazipour, A. (2017). Duties of the Securities and Exchange Organization in crime prevention. Strategic Quarterly, 26(82): 327-355. [in persian]
Peyvandi, S. (2014). Application of the Beneish model to predict fraud and its relationship with stock returns and earnings quality with a forensic accounting approach. Master's thesis. Semnan University. [in persian]
Qorchi Beigi, M. (2019). Qualitative analysis of white-collar crime: Understanding the contexts and motivations. Iranian Social Issues Quarterly, No.10. [in persian]
Rae, K., Sands, J. & Subramaniam, N. (2017). Associations among the five components within COSO internal control-integrated framework as the underpinning of quality corporate governance. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1): 28-54.
Rezaei, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterrence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(3): 277-298.
Richard, O. (2004). What is transparency? United States: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Silverman, D. (2005). Instances or sequences? Improving the state of the art of qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3): 25-39.
Soleimani, G.R. & Moghaddasi Nikjeh, M. (2014). The role of internal controls, internal audit, and audit committee in improving corporate governance systems. Accounting Research, 3(12).
[in persian]
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Trans. B. Mohammadi. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Vizon, L.W. & et al. (2000). Economic crime against consumers and investors. Available at: https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No55/No55_23RC_Group3.pdf
Wanath, T. & Kaufman, D.E. (1999). Toward transparency in finance and governance. The World Bank.
Wei, T. (2002). Causal factors of corporate crime in Taiwan: Qualitative and quantitative findings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(2): 183-205.
Wells, J.T. (2017). Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley,
(4th ed).
CAPTCHA Image