Teachers' sensitivity to cyberbullying: Investigating the role of perception of digital ethics and awareness of digital data security

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associated prof, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 M. A., Department of Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University. Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Cyberbullying refers to a set of harassing and aggressive behaviors that are carried out through digital tools. The present study aimed to investigate teachers' sensitivity to cyberbullying and the role of digital ethics perception and awareness of digital data security in predicting it.
Methodology: This research is applied in terms of purpose and is a correlational study in terms of type. The research population includes 2082 teachers in Noorabad city in the academic year 2024-2025. The sample size based on Morgan's table was 324 people (185 male and 139 female) who were selected by available sampling method. Research data were collected using the "Cyberbullying Questionnaire, Tanrıkulu., Kınay & Arıcak (2013)", "Digital Ethics Perception Questionnaire, Torun (2014)" and "Digital Data Security Awareness Questionnaire, Yılmaz, Şahin & Akbulut (2015)". data analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistical indicators including percentage and frequency, and inferential statistics such as multivariate regression, one-sample t-test, Hoteling's t-test and correlation coefficient by using SPSS software.
Findings: The research findings showed that the average level of sensitivity to cyberbullying is 32.83. This value is higher than the hypothetical average (26) and is positive and significant (P < 0.01). The average level of perception of digital ethics is 53.56. This value is lower than the hypothetical average (112) and is significant (P < 0.01). The average level of awareness of digital data security is 93.62. This value is lower than the hypothetical average (96) and is not significant (P = 0.151); therefore, it can be said that the level of sensitivity to cyberbullying and perception of digital ethics of teachers in Noorabad city is desirable and the level of awareness of digital data security is undesirable. The level of sensitivity to cyberbullying, perception of digital ethics and awareness of digital data security of teachers in Noorabad city is at an average level. The coefficients of the equation predicting susceptibility to cyberbullying based on digital ethics and its components showed that among the variables studied, only the components of accuracy and trust significantly predict the variance of the susceptibility to cyberbullying variable. The effect coefficients of accuracy (B=-0.235) and trust (B=-0.206) are, indicating that accuracy and trust have a negative and significant relationship with susceptibility to cyberbullying. That is, these two components have significantly reduced teachers' sensitivity to cyberbullying. Also, according to the T statistic, it can be said that the components of trust and ownership can predict the changes related to cyberbullying sensitivity in teachers with 99% confidence. These variables predict a total of 32% of the variance of the sensitivity variable towards cyberbullying. Also, the findings show the relationship between teachers' sensitivity to cyberbullying and teachers' perception of digital ethics. Also, there is a significant difference in teachers' sensitivity to cyberbullying based on gender, and the perception of digital ethics is a significant predictor of cyberbullying sensitivity.
Conclusion: The results of this research show that the level of sensitivity to cyber bullying, perception of digital ethics and awareness of digital data security among the teachers of educational courses in Noorabad city was at an average level; Therefore, it is suggested to increase the sensitivity towards cyberbullying, teachers' perception of digital ethics and awareness of digital data security, to create a space for discussion and exchange of opinions about ethical issues related to technology and the use of digital tools in order to strengthen teachers' perception and understanding of These topics help. The results of this research showed that there is a significant difference between teachers' sensitivity to cyberbullying, perception of digital ethics and awareness of digital data security according to gender. In this regard, male teachers were, on average, more sensitive to cyberbullying than female teachers. This result shows that men need more awareness and training in this field. On average, female teachers had a higher perception of digital ethics than male teachers. This result shows that women generally pay more attention to ethical principles in using digital technology. Also, male teachers were more aware of digital data security than female teachers. This result shows that male teachers are usually more capable in matters related to digital data security.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Akman, E., Önder, İ. D. İ. L., & Çakir, R. (2023). An Investigation into the Levels of Digital Parenting, Digital Literacy, and Digital Data Security Awareness among Parents and Teachers in Early Childhood Education. Participatory Educational Research10(5), 248-263.
Avcı, Ü., & Arslan, E. (2019). The effect of in-service training with digital data security awareness and information literacy. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFS), 52(3), 893–916.
Aydın, İ., & Arslan, K. (2021). Examining the cyberbullying awareness levels of senior preservice teachers: Example of Buca faculty of education. Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 4(2), 295–314.
Baker, Ö. E., & Kavşut, F. (2007). Cyber bullying: A new face of peer bullying. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research27, 31-42.
Chua, H. N., Teh, J. S., & Herbland, A. (2021). Identifying the effect of data breach publicity on information security awareness using hierarchical regression. IEEE Access9, 121759-121770.
Deryol, R., Wilcox, P., & Stone, S. (2022). Individual risk, country-level social support, and bullying and cyberbullying victimization among youths: a cross-national study. Journal of interpersonal violence37(17-18), NP15275-NP15311.
Espelage, D. L., Hong, J. S., & Valido, A. (2024). Cyberbullying. In Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 654-673). Routledge.
Gümüş, M. M., Çakır, R., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2023). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ sensitivity to cyberbullying, perceptions of digital ethics and awareness of digital data security. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23.
Güngör, B., Tingiş, E., & Sarol, B. (2020). Investigation of cyberbullying levels of social studies preservice teachers. Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies, 3(2), 147–160.
Henares-Montiel, J., Benítez-Hidalgo, V., Ruiz-Pérez, I., Pastor-Moreno, G., & Rodríguez-Barranco, M. (2022). Cyberbullying and associated factors in member countries of the European Union: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with representative population samples. International journal of environmental research and public health19(12), 7364.
Hızmalı, A. M., & Tosun, N. (2022). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Dijital Verı̇ Güvenliğı̇ Farkındalıklarının Çeşitlı̇ Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesı̇ [Investigation of Digital Data Security awareness of university students in terms of various variables]. The 14th International Scientific Research Congress (p. 137). Turkey: Ankara.
Karakuş, S., & Turan, S. G. (2022). Examining the relationship between adults’ cyberbullying behaviors and digital citizenship skills. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 49, 409–427. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.983075.
Lan, M., Law, N., & Pan, Q. (2022). Effectiveness of anti-cyberbullying educational programs: A socio-ecologically grounded systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior130, 107200.
Linderholm, A. (2019). Teacher awareness and perceptions of social media use and cyberbullying in Belize [Master’s thesis, Minnesota State University, Mankato]. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/934/
Nilakusmawati, D. P. E., Adinugraha, D. M. A., Srinadi, I. G. A. M., & Bharata, G. G. A. (2022). Study of Perceptions of Social Media Users Regarding Digital Ethics. International Journal of Human Resource Studies12(3), 121-121.
Ossa, F. C., Jantzer, V., Neumayer, F., Eppelmann, L., Resch, F., & Kaess, M. (2023). Cyberbullying and school bullying are related to additive adverse effects among adolescents. Psychopathology56(1-2), 127-137.
Özcan, N. (2021). A qualitative research on Digital Ethics. Journal of Youth Studies9(25), 89-108.
Öztürk, C. (2019). The investigation of relation between digital citizenship levels and tendencies to cyberbullying of 8th grade students’ Unpublished master’s thesis, Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya
Paniagua, C., García-Moya, I., Sánchez-Queija, I., & Moreno, C. (2022). Bullying, cyberbullying, and adoption: What is the role of student–teacher connectedness?. School psychology37(5), 367.
Pichel, R., Feijóo, S., Isorna, M., Varela, J., & Rial, A. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between school bullying, cyberbullying, and substance use. Children and youth services review134, 106369.
Prott, F., & Scholl, M. (2022). Raising Information Security Awareness Using Digital Serious Games With Emotional Design. Iadis International Journal on WWW/Internet20(2).
Sam, D. L., Bruce, D., Agyemang, C. B., Amponsah, B., & Arkorful, H. (2019). Cyberbullying victimization among high school and university students in Ghana. Deviant Behavior40(11), 1305-1321. Saritepeci, M., Yildiz Durak, H., Özüdoğru, G., & Atman Uslu, N. (2024). The role of digital literacy and digital data security awareness in online privacy concerns: a multi-group analysis with gender. Online Information Review, 48(5), 983-1001
Şimşek, N., Şahin, D., & Evli, M. (2019). Internet addiction, cyberbullying, and victimization relationship in adolescents: a sample from Turkey. Journal of addictions nursing30(3), 201-210.
Sizova, O. A., Medvedeva, T. Y., Trzhetsyak, I. A., Markova, S. M., Okuneva, P. E., Zanozin, N. V., & Ulyanova, R. A. (2021). The role of teacher in Moral and Ethıcal Educatıon of students. AD Alta-Journal of Interdıscıplınary Research, 11(1), 50–52.
Tanrıkulu, T., Kınay, H., & Arıcak, O. T. (2013). Cyberbullying sensibility scale: Validity and reliability study. Trakya University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 3(1), 38–47.
Tekke, A., & Lale, A. (2021). Ethics, information manipulation and cyber security in social media. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi,16 (2),44-62.
Torres-Hernández, N., & Gallego-Arrufat, M. J. (2022). Indicators to assess preservice teachers’ digital competence in security: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies27(6), 8583-8602.
Torun, E. D. (2014). Modeling of unethical behaviors in the use of information and communication technologies. Erciyes Journal of Communication, 3(3), 56–71.
UNICEF (2020). Cyberbullying: What is it and how to stop it. https://www.unicef.org/endviolence/how-to-stop-cyberbullying on 02.04.2022.
Vale, M., Pereira, F., Spitzberg, B. H., & Matos, M. (2022). Cyber‐harassment victimization of Portuguese adolescents: A lifestyle‐routine activities theory approach. Behavioral sciences & the law40(5), 604-618.
Yildirim, A., Celikten, M., Desiatov, T., & Lodatko, Y. (2019). The analysis of teachers’ cyber bullying, cyber victimization and cyber bullying sensitivity based on various variables. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1029
Yılmaz, E., Şahin, Y. L., & Akbulut, Y. (2015). Development of the digital data security awareness scale. AJIT-e: Online Journal of Information Technologies, 6(21), 23–40.
Yunita, R. (2021). Perundungan Maya (Cyber Bullying) Pada Remaja Awal. MUHAFADZAH1(2), 93-110.
CAPTCHA Image