Providing a dynamic model for the continuity of digital technologies in innovative businesses (startups)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran

2 PhD. Student, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: In the new era of the digital economy, businesses encounter heightened competition and a wealth of opportunities. Meanwhile, many traditional businesses are embarking on a digitization journey toward more digital business models and are eager to implement digital technologies across all functions of their operations. Many startups are leveraging advanced technologies to address problems economically. These startups not only develop innovative products that enhance quality of life but also create numerous job opportunities, thereby contributing to economic growth. Therefore, this research was conducted with the aim of developing a dynamic model to support the ongoing integration of digital technologies in innovative businesses, particularly startups.
Method: This research is qualitative in terms of approach and applied-descriptive in terms of purpose, the research strategy is data-based, which is based on the constructivist approach (Charms) to form the theory. Interview of experts in the field of innovative businesses (startups) The statistical population includes experts and experts and entrepreneurs in the field of innovative businesses (startups), of which 10 people participated in the research through theoretical sampling through semi-structured in-depth interviews. The number of samples follows the rule of saturation. In order to ensure complete and comprehensive data acquisition and not to lose the basic dimensions of the research, a predetermined framework including three questions for experts was used as an interview guide. It should be mentioned that after each interview and data analysis, the cases that needed more reading were asked in the interviews and the interview questions were adjusted accordingly. The content of all the interviews is documented and recorded in the form of guide notes. The method of two coders was used to calculate the reliability, which is equal to 78%. Considering that the reliability level is more than 60%, the coding reliability was confirmed and it can be claimed that the reliability level of the current interview analysis is appropriate. Finally, to prove and confirm and rank the proposed components, Shannon's entropy statistical method was used based on expert opinion.
Findings: After analyzing the data, a dynamic model for the ongoing integration of digital technology in innovative businesses and startups was developed. This model encompasses the following components: 1. Requirements: Market changes, globalization, and new workplace norms.
2. Background Conditions: Internal and external stimuli, as well as initiatives for change and transformation. 3. Intervening Factors: Organizational and cultural obstacles, along with a lack of technological capabilities. 4. Strategies: Survival strategies, integration strategies, and research and development initiatives. 5. Consequences: The creation of social networks, digital leadership, market positioning, increased agility, and the establishment of data-driven marketplaces. Finally, after completing the analysis of the qualitative data, the coding should be presented in the form of a model. This model should elucidate the creator of cause-and-effect relationships and identify significant and noteworthy categories. Since Charms does not offer a predefined model and leaves this task entirely to the discretion of the researcher, a model was developed based on the researcher's perspective that accurately represents the relationships between the categories. After analyzing the data, a dynamic model of the continuation of digital technology in innovative businesses or startups was developed, which includes the following components: requirements (market changes, globalization, new norms of the workplace), background conditions (internal and external stimuli and initiatives of change and transformation), intervening factors (organizational-cultural obstacles and lack of technological capabilities), strategies (survival strategy, integration strategy and research and development), consequences (creating society network, digital leadership, positioning in the market, increasing agility and creating data-driven marketplaces. Finally, after finishing the analysis on the qualitative data, the codings should be presented in the form of a model. A model that explains the creator of cause and effect relationships and identifies important and outstanding categories. Since Charms does not provide a pre-defined model and leaves this work entirely at the discretion of the researcher, based on Researcher's opinion A model that is a correct explanation for expressing the relationships between categories was developed.
Conclusion: Digital technologies enable the development of relationships among various stakeholders who interact dynamically to execute business processes and foster innovation. This indicates that the diffusion of digital technologies, which facilitate collaboration, has created new opportunities for the development of innovative businesses. Therefore, in new and dynamic markets, startups must be the first to identify and capitalize on the opportunities presented by digital technologies, particularly concerning the launch of a new venture. Therefore, digital technologies serve as a crucial business channel for startups across various sectors, including new product development, innovation of existing products and processes, market analysis, and understanding customer needs and satisfaction.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Audretsch, D.B. & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5): 1030-1051.
Averina, T., Barkalov, S., Fedorova, I. & Poryadina, V. (2021). Impact of digital technologies on the company’s business model. In: E3S web of conferences (Vol. 244, p. 10002). EDP Sciences.‏
Bazargan Herandi, A. (2008). Mixed research method: A superior approach for management studies. Management Knowledge, 21(81): 19-36. [in persian]
Blank, S. & Dorf, B. (2012). The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. BookBaby, Pennsauken, NJ.
Bocken, N. & Snihur, Y. (2020). Lean Startup and the business model: Experimenting for novelty and impact. Long Range Planning, 53(4): 101953.‏
Cantner, U., Cunningham, J.A., Lehmann, E.E. & Menter, M. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model. Small Business Economics, 57(1): 407-423.       
https://doi.org/10.1007/S11187-020-00316-0
Castagna, F., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., Oropallo, E. & Passaro, R. (2020). Customer knowledge management in SMEs facing digital transformation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9).
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R. & Esposito, E. (2017). Knowledge management in startups: systematic literature review and future research agenda. Sustainability, 9(3). 
https://doi.org/10.3390/ su9030361
Cerchione, R., Centobelli, P., Riccio, E., Abbate, S. & Oropallo, E. (2022). Blockchain’s coming to hospital to digitalize healthcare services: designing a distributed electronic health record ecosystem. Technovation, no. 120: 102480.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded theory: a Practical Guide Through Qualitative analysis. Wiltshire: Sage Publication.
Chen, C.L., Lin, Y.C., Chen, W.H., Chao, C.F. & Pandia, H. (2021). Role of government to enhance digital transformation in small service business. Sustainability, 13(3).
Climent, R.C. & Haftor, D.M. (2021). Business model theory-based prediction of digital technology use: An empirical assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 173.
Dinesh, K.K. & Sushil, P. (2019). Strategic innovation factors in startups: results of a cross-case analysis of Indian startups. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 12(3): 449-470.‏
Elia, G., Margherita, A. & Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: how digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 150.
European Commission (2015). Digital Transformation of European Industry and Enterprises. URL= http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/9462/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native.
Fathi, F., Mirabi, V.R. & Haghighat Monfared, J. (2022). Identifying the importance of ideation and timing in the success of start-ups with an emphasis on planning financial resources and investment. Financial Economics, 16(58): 330-309. [in persian]
Ismail, N., Jaffar, N., Khan, S. & Leng, T.S. (2012). Tracking the cyber entrepreneurial intention of private universities students in Malaysia. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 17(4): 538-546.
Khakpour, M., Tamjid Pamchelo, A.R. & Kiani, K. (2022). The effect of business intelligence capacity, network learning and innovation on the performance of start-ups. Executive Management Research Journal, 14(27): 257-275. [in persian]
Kmecová, I. (2020). Digitization, digital technology, and importance of digital technology in teaching. In: Digital Age: Chances, Challenges and Future 7, Springer International Publishing: 526-537.
Kraus, S., Palmer, C., Kailer, N., Kallinger, F.L. & Spitzer, J. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship: a research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 25(2): 353-375.  
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2018-0425
Liu, H., Wang, Q. & Mei, Y. (2012). Effects of start-up firm’s social network on knowledge transfer: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, Sanya, China: 228-233.
McDonald, R.M. & Eisenhardt, K.M. (2020). Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(2): 483-523.‏
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A. & Song, M. (2017). Digital Innovation Management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1): 223-228.
Nosova, S. & Norkina, A. (2021). Digital technologies as a new component of the business process. Procedia Computer Science, no. 190: 651-656.‏
Nurbakhsh, N. (2021). The role of e-commerce on the performance of start-ups. New research approaches in management and accounting, 5(18): 59-82. [in persian]
OECD (2017). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2017: The Digital Transformation. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268821-en
OECD (2018). The evaluation of the Italian ‘start-up act. OECD Science, Technology and Industry
policy papers, September, No. 54.
Opazo-Basáez, M., Vendrell-Herrero, F. & Bustinza, O. F. (2022). Digital service innovation: a paradigm shift in technological innovation. Journal of Service Management, 33(1): 97-120.‏
Pascucci, F., Savelli, E. & Gistri, G. (2023). How digital technologies reshape marketing: evidence from a qualitative investigation. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2023(1): 27-58.‏
Pirola, F., Boucher, X., Wiesner, S. & Pezzotta, G. (2020). Digital technologies in product-service systems: a literature review and a research agenda. Computers in Industry, no.123.
Prause, M. & Gunther, C. (2019). Technology diffusion of industry 4.0. An Agent-Based Approach, 9(1-2): 29-48.
Raguseo, E. & Vitari, C. (2018). Investments in big data analytics and firm performance: an empirical investigation of direct and mediating effects. International Journal of Production Research, 56(15): 5206-5221.
Rahimpour, M., Yahiizadehfar, M., Aghajani, H.A. & Azar, A. (2019). Systematic model of creating new and innovative businesses. Strategic Management Studies, 43(11): 94-110. [in persian]
Rahman Seresht, H., Dehdashti Shahrokh, Z., Khashei, V. & Dost Mohammadian, Sh. (2019). The resilience model of startups in the information and communication technology industry (multi-case study with a historical approach). Management Improvement, 14(2): 1-32. [in persian]
Ramaswamy, V. & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, no. 84: 196-205.
Rubin, T.H., Aas, T.H. & Stead, A. (2015). Knowledge flow in technological business incubators: evidence from Australia and Israel. Technovation, no. 41: 11-24.
Sahut, J.M., Iandoli, L. & Teulon, F. (2021). The age of digital entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 56(3): 1159-1169.
Shabbir, M.S., Mohd Shariff, M.N., Kiran, R., Ahmad Zaidi, M.F. & Shahzad, A. (2016). Cyber entrepreneurship: a note on indigenous perspective from a developing country. The Social Sciences, 11(5): 704-709.
Shahraki Moghadam, Sh. & Farsijani, H. (2022). Identifying influential factors in the promotion and growth of startups. New research approaches in management and accounting, 6(20): 2249-2234. [in persian]
Steininger, D.M. (2019). Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: a review and agenda for IT associated and digital entrepreneurship research. Information Systems Journal, 29(2): 363-407.
Tirehkar, B., Pourhossein, D., Seyed Naqvi, M. & Rezaei Manesh, B. (2021). A qualitative model
of talent management in start-up businesses. Resource management in the police force, 9(3):
288-247. [in persian]
Unterkalmsteiner, M., Abrahamsson, P., Wang, X., Nguyen-Duc, A., Shah, S. Q., Bajwa, S.S. & et al. (2016). Software startups–a research agenda. e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, 10(1): 89-123.‏
Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., Dumay, J. & Enjeti, M. (2019). Straight from the horse’s mouth: founders’ perspectives on achieving ’traction’ in digital start-ups. Computers in Human Behavior, no. 95: 262-274.
CAPTCHA Image