نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی دانشگاه شیراز ؛ مربی، مرکز منطقه‌ای اطلاع‌رسانی علوم و فناوری، شیراز، ایران
2 دانشیار،علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
3 استاد، علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
4 دانشیار، مهندسی و علوم کامپیوتر و فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
compare the views of researchers in two field about the importance of criteria for submitting an article to the journal and the degree of thematic relevance of the proposed results of the RICeST Journal Finder.
The research is a survey in terms of applied purpose and data collection method. The first step of the study is based on a researcher-made questionnaire and the views of researchers and the second step is based on a checklist containing the textual elements of articles and the opinion of subject experts.
Criteria of Peer review,, relevance of the article with the scope of the journal and having IF from the perspective of researchers in both groups, were the most importance and the age of the journal was last. Measuring the thematic relevance of results suggested by system using the opinions of experts showed that in more than 85% of the queries, the proposed publication for the article is completely relevant. There is no statistically significant difference between the opinions of experts in these two areas.
Results: Given the possibility of refining the results based on other priority criteria, it seems that the use of these systems can be useful as a tool for researchers.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله