بررسی اثرات سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر اشتراک گذاری و پنهان سازی دانش با نقش میانجی اخلاق کار اسلامی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش ‌آموخته دکتری مدیریت فرهنگی، مدرس دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز فارسان

2 استادیار، عضو هیات علمی گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان(خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

3 دانش ‌آموخته دکتری مدیریت فرهنگی، مدرس دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز هرند

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثرات سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر اشتراک گذاری و پنهان سازی دانش با نقش میانجی اخلاق کار اسلامی است، پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه های استان چهارمحال و بختیاری بودند، که تعداد آن ها 2255 نفر است، با توجه به حجم هر منطقه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 660 نفر حجم نمونه انتخاب گردید و افراد نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری طبقه‌ای متناسب با حجم هر طبقه نتخاب شدند

و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها در سطح استنباطی مشتمل بر مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام گرفتو تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها به کمک معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزار وارپ انجام گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر اشتراک گذاری دانش تاثیر منفی و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 22/0 -است و سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر پنهان سازی دانش تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 11/0 استهدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثرات سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر اشتراک گذاری و پنهان سازی دانش با نقش میانجی اخلاق کار اسلامی است، پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه های استان چهارمحال و بختیاری بودند، که تعداد آن ها 2255 نفر است، با توجه به حجم هر منطقه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 660 نفر حجم نمونه انتخاب گردید و افراد نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری طبقه‌ای متناسب با حجم هر طبقه نتخاب شدند

و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها در سطح استنباطی مشتمل بر مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام گرفتو تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها به کمک معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزار وارپ انجام گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر اشتراک گذاری دانش تاثیر منفی و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 22/0 -است و سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر پنهان سازی دانش تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 11/0 استهدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثرات سرپرستی توهین آمیز بر اشتراک گذاری و پنهان سازی دانش با نقش میانجی اخلاق کار اسلامی است، پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه های استان چهارمحال و بختیاری بودند، که تعداد آن ها 2255 نفر است، با توجه به حجم هر منطقه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران 660 نفر حجم نمونه انتخاب گردید و افراد نمونه با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری طبقه‌ای متناسب با حجم هر طبقه نتخاب شدند

و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها در سطح استنباطی مشتمل بر مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام گرفتو تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها به کمک معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزار وارپ انجام گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر اشتراک گذاری دانش تاثیر منفی و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 22/0 -است و سرپرستی توهین آمیز از طریق اخلاق کار اسلامی بر پنهان سازی دانش تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد که ضریب این تاثیر 11/0 است

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing and concealment with the mediating role of Islamic work ethics

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abbas Ghaedamini Harouni 1
  • Mehrdad Sadeghi de cheshmeh 2
  • Ghulam Reza Maleki Farsani 3
1 PhD in Cultural Management, , lecturer at the Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences of Farsan Center
2 Associate of professor of management,Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 PhD in Cultural Management, , lecturer at the Comprehensive University of Applied Sciences of Harand Center
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing and concealment with the mediating role of Islamic work ethics. The statistical population of this research was all the employees of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari universities, whose number is 2255 people, according to the size of each region, a sample size of 660 people was selected using Cochran's formula, and the sample people were selected using the stratified sampling method. They were chosen according to the volume of each floor

And the data analysis was done at the inferential level, including the modeling of structural equations, and the data analysis was done with the help of structural equations in Warp software. The results of the research showed that abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a negative and significant effect on knowledge sharing, and the coefficient of this effect is 0.22, and abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a positive and significant effect on knowledge concealment, which coefficient is 0.22. This effect is 0.11The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing and concealment with the mediating role of Islamic work ethics. The statistical population of this research was all the employees of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari universities, whose number is 2255 people, according to the size of each region, a sample size of 660 people was selected using Cochran's formula, and the sample people were selected using the stratified sampling method. They were chosen according to the volume of each floor

And the data analysis was done at the inferential level, including the modeling of structural equations, and the data analysis was done with the help of structural equations in Warp software. The results of the research showed that abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a negative and significant effect on knowledge sharing, and the coefficient of this effect is 0.22, and abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a positive and significant effect on knowledge concealment, which coefficient is 0.22. This effect is 0.11The purpose of this research is to determine the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge sharing and concealment with the mediating role of Islamic work ethics. The statistical population of this research was all the employees of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari universities, whose number is 2255 people, according to the size of each region, a sample size of 660 people was selected using Cochran's formula, and the sample people were selected using the stratified sampling method. They were chosen according to the volume of each floor

And the data analysis was done at the inferential level, including the modeling of structural equations, and the data analysis was done with the help of structural equations in Warp software. The results of the research showed that abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a negative and significant effect on knowledge sharing, and the coefficient of this effect is 0.22, and abusive supervision through Islamic work ethics has a positive and significant effect on knowledge concealment, which coefficient is 0.22. This effect is 0.11

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Abusive supervision
  • sharing knowledge
  • hiding knowledge
  • Islamic work ethic
  • State University
  • Azad University
Quran.
Abbas A. (2004). Scaling an Islamic Work Ethic. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(5):
575-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9922911.
Agarwal, U.A. (2019). Examining links between abusive supervision, PsyCap, LMX and outcomes. Management Decision, 57(5): 1304-1334. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021103356
Ahmad, S. (2018). Can ethical leadership inhibit workplace bullying across East and West: exploring cross-cultural interactional justice as a mediating mechanism. European Management Journal, 36(2): 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.01.003
Ali, A. & Al-Kazemi, A. (2007). Islamic work ethic in Kuwait. Cross Culture Management: An International Journal, 14(2): 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600710745714
Ali, A.J. & Al-Owaihan, A. (2008). Islamic work ethic: a critical review. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15(1): 5-19.         
https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600810848791
Ali, A.J. (1992). The islamic work ethic in arabia. Journal of Psychology, 126(5): 507-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1992.10543384
Anser, M.K., Ali, M., Usman, M., Rana, M.L.T. & Yousaf, Z. (2021). Ethicalleadership and knowledge hiding: an intervening and interactional analysis. Serv. Indust. J. 41: 307–329.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1739657
Aryee, S., Sun, L.Y., Chen, Z.X.G. & Debrah, Y.A. (2008). Abusive supervision and contextual performance: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 393-411.          
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00118.x
Ashfaq, S., Mahmood, Z. & Ahmad, M. (2013). Impact of Work-Life Conflict and Work over Load on Employee Performance in Banking Sector of Pakistan. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(5): 688-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.5.1754
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffos, New Jersey.
Bashir, M., Shabbir, R., Saleem, S., Abrar, M., Saqib, S. & Gill, S.H. (2020). Job-related and nonjob-related gossips among low-ranked employees in unionized service organization. Front. Psychol., 11: 994. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00994
bin Salahudin, S.N., binti Baharuddin, S.S., Abdullah, M.S. & Osman, A. (2016). The effect of Islamic work ethics on organizational commitment. Procedia Economics and Finance, 130(35): 582-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00071-x
Choi, W., Kim, S.L. & Yun, S. (2019). A social exchange perspective of abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: Investigating the moderating effects of psychological contract fulfillment and self-enhancement motive. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(3): 305–319.        
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9542-0
Connelly, C.E. & Zweig, D. (2015). How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal ofWork and Organizational Psychology, 24(3): 479-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.931325
Connelly, C.E., Zweig, D., Webster, J. & Trougakos, J.P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1): 64-88.            
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.737
Cropanzano, R. & Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6): 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
Di Vaio, A., Hasan, S., Palladino, R., Profita, F. & Mejri, I. (2021). Understanding knowledge hiding in business organizations: a bibliometric analysis of research trends, 1988–2020. J. Busi. Res., 134: 560-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.040
Dollard, J., Miller, N.E., Doob, L.W., Mowrer, O.H. & Sears, R.R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Feng, J. & Wang, C. (2019). Does abusive supervision always promote employees to hide knowledge? From both reactance and COR perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7): 1455-1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0737
Folger, R. & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: justice as accountability. In: Greenberg, J. & Cropanzano, R. (Eds), Advances in Organizational Justice, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1: 1-55.
Ghani, U., Teo, T., Li, Y., Usman, M., Islam, Z.U., Gul, H., Naeem, R.M., Bahadar, H., Yuan, J. & Zhai, X. (2020). Tit for Tat: Abusive Supervision and Knowledge Hiding-The Role of Psychological Contract Breach and Psychological Ownership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4): 1240.          
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041240
Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
Groenewegen, S.A.M., Botke, J.A. & Kersten, A. (2020). De invloed van Abusief Werkgedrag op Knowledge Hiding van werknemers. Bachelor Thesis – Human Resource Studies. School of Social and Behavioral Science, Tilburg University.
Gul, R.F., Dunnan, L., Jamil, K., Awan, F.H., Ali, B., Qaiser, A. & Aobin, Q. (2021). Abusive Supervision and Its Impact on Knowledge Hiding Behavior Among Sales Force. Front Psychol, 12: 800778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.800778
Hamid, Z.A. (2011). Knowledge sharing in Islam: Implications for practice in organizations. In: Spirituality in Management from Islamic Perspectives. IIUM Press, Kuala Lumpur: 155-190.
Han, M.S., Masood, K., Cudjoe, D. & Wang, Y. (2021). Knowledge hiding asthe dark side of competitive psychological climate. Leadership Org. Dev. J. 42: 195–207.  
https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2020-0090
Han, S.H., Seo, G., Yoon, S.W. & Yoon, D.Y. (2016). Transformational leadership and knowledge sharing: mediating roles of employee’s empowerment, commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(3): 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020927426
Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W. & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with Abusive Supervision: The Neutralizing Effects of Ingratiation and Positive Effect on Negative Employee Outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2): 264-280.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.008
Hassan, M.K., Miglietta, F., Paltrinieri, A. & Floreani, J. (2018). The effects of Shariah board composition on Islamic equity indices’ performance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(3): 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-09-2021-0180.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultural consequences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Islam, T., Ahmad, S., Kaleem, A. & Mahmood, K. (2021). Abusive supervision and knowledge sharing: moderating roles of Islamic work ethic and learning goal orientation. Management Decision, 59)2(: 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2019-1069
Jahanzeb, S., Fatima, F., Bouckenooghe, D. & Bashir, (2019). The knowledge hiding link: a moderated mediation model of how abusive supervision affects employee creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6): 810-819.          
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1659245
Jahanzeb, S., Fatima, T., Bouckenooghe, D. & Bashir, F. (2019). The knowledge hiding link: a moderated mediation model of how abusive supervision affects employee creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6): 810-819.          
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03822-4
Javed, B., Bashir, S., Rawwas, M.Y. & Arjoon, S. (2017). Islamic work ethic, innovative work behaviour, and adaptive performance: the mediating mechanism and an interacting effect. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(6): 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1171830
Jiang, W. & Gu, Q. (2016). How abusive supervision and abusive supervisory climate influence salesperson creativity. Management Decision, 54(2): 455-475.            
https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2015-0302
Jones, D.A. (2009). A novel approach to business ethics training: improving moral reasoning in just a few weeks. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2): 367-379.         
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9969-8
Kalemci, R.A. & Tuzun, I.K. (2019). Understanding protestant and islamic work ethic studies: a content analysis of articles. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(4): 999-1008.   
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3716-y
Khalid, M., Bashir, S., Khan, A.K. & Abbas, N. (2018). When and how abusive supervision leads to knowledge hiding behaviors: an Islamic work ethics perspective. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(6): 794-806.        
https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2017-0140
Khan, K., Abbas, M., Gul, A. & Raja, U. (2015). Organizational justice and job outcomes: Moderating role of Islamic work ethic. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(2): 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1937-2
Khan, S.N., Qureshi, I.M. & Ahmad, H.I. (2010). Abusive supervision and negative employee outcomes. European journal of social sciences, 15(4): 490-500.    
https://doi.org/10.1177/030630701504100105
Khoreva, V. & Wechtler, H. (2020). Exploring the consequences of knowledgehiding: an agency theory perspective. J. Manag. Psychol., 35: 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0514
Kim, S.L., Kim, M. & Yun, S. (2015). Knowledge sharing, abusive supervision and support: a social exchange perspective. Group and Organization Management, 40(5): 599-624.      
https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115577514
Kim, S.L., Lee, S. & Yun, S. (2016). Abusive supervision, knowledge sharing, and individual factors: a conservation-of-resources perspective. Managerial Psychology, 31(6): 1106-1120.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2015-0169
Kirrane, M., Kilroy, S. & O'Connor, C. (2019). The moderating effect of team psychological empowerment on the relationship between abusive supervision and engagement. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(1): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2018-0252
Krasikova, D.V., Green, S.G. & LeBreton, J.M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39(5): 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471388
Kremer, H., Villamor, I. & Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. Business Horizons, 62(1): 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.010
Kumar Jha, J. & Varkkey, B. (2018). Are you a cistern or a channel? Exploring factors triggering knowledge-hiding behavior at the workplace: evidence from the Indian R&D professionals. J. Knowl. Manag, 22: 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2017-0048
Le, P.B. & Lei, H. (2018). The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(3): 521-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0463
Lee, S., Kim, S.L. & Yun, S. (2017). A moderated mediation model of the relationship between abusive supervision and knowledge sharing. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(3): 403-413.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.001
Lian, H.W., Ferris, D.L. & Brown, D.J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1): 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.003
Liu, D., Liao, H. & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5): 1187-1212. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400
Liu, N.C. & Liu, M.S. (2011). Human resource practices and individual knowledge-sharing behavior – an empirical study for taiwanese R&D professionals. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(4): 981-997.           
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.555138
Liu, S., ZHU, Q. & Wei, F. (2019). How Abusive Supervision Affects Employees’ Unethical Behaviors: A Moderated Mediation Examination of Turnover Intentions and Caring Climate. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(21): 4187.            
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214187
Lyu, Y., Zhu, H., Zhong, H.J. & Hu, L. (2016). Abusive supervision and customer-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of hostile attribution bias and work engagement. International Journal of Hospitality management, 53: 69-80.              
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.12.001
Ma, Z., Song, L. & Huang, J. (2022). How Peer Abusive Supervision Affects Sales Employees’ Customer Knowledge Hiding: The Roles of Rivalry and Schadenfreude. Psychol Res Behav Manag, 15: 1067-1083. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S359360
Martinko, M.J., Harvey, P., Brees, J.R. & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1): 120–137.      
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1888
Miminoshvili, M. & Cerne, M. (2022). Workplace inclusion–exclusion and knowledge-hiding behaviour of minority members. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract., 20(3): 422-435.      
https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2021.1960914
Mitchell, M.S. & Ambrose, M.L. (2007) .Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Applied Psychology, 92(4): 1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
Murtaza, G., Abbas, M., Raja, U., Roques, O., Khalid, A. & Mushtaq, R. (2016). Impact of Islamic work ethics on organizational citizenship behaviors and knowledge-sharing behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 133(2): 325-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2396-0
Nguyen, T.-M., Malik, A. & Budhwar, P. (2022). Knowledge hiding inorganizational crisis: The moderating role of leadership. J. Bus. Res., 139: 161–172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.026
Peltokorpi, V. (2019). Abusive supervision and emotional exhaustion: the moderating role of power distance orientation and the mediating role of interaction avoidance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53(3): 251-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12188
Peng, H. (2012). Counterproductive work behavior among Chinese knowledge workers. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(2): 119-138.       
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00586.x
Pradhan, S. & Jena, L.K. (2017). Effect of abusive supervision on employee’s intention to quit and the neutralizing role of meaningful work in Indian IT organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25(5): 825-838. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2017-1107
Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. & Folger, R. (2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiplemediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5): 1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237
Rafferty, A.E. & Restubog, S.L.D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviors: the hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22(2): 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00732.x
Ragab Rizk, R. (2008). Back to basics: an Islamic perspective on business and work ethics. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2): 246-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110810856992
Ruparel, N. & Choubisa, R. (2020). Knowledge hiding in organizations: a retrospective narrative review and the way rward. Slovenian academy of management, 9(1): 5-22. 
https://doi.org/10.17708/DRMJ.2020.v09n01a01
Serenko, A. & Bontis, N. (2016). Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6): 1199-1224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2016-0203
Singh, S.K. (2019). Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding. J. Bus. Res., 97: 10–19.     
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.034
Skarlicki, D.P. & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3): 434-443.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.434
Srivastava, A., Bartol, K.M. & Locke, E.A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6): 1239-1251. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478718
Tepper, B.J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2): 178–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556375
Tepper, B.J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3): 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
Tepper, B.J., Duffy, M.K., Henle, C.A. & Lambert, L.S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1): 101-123.         
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00725.x
Tepper, B.J., Duffy, M.K., Hoobler, J. & Ensley, M.D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.455
Wang, S. & Noe, R.A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2): 115-131.    
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
Wu, T.-Y. (2008). Abusive supervision and emotional exhaustion: The mediating effects of subordinate justice perception and emotional labor. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 50(2): 201–221.
Wu, W.L. & Lee, Y.C. (2016). Do employees share knowledge when encountering abusive supervision? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1): 154-168.          
https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2013-0410.
Xiao, M. & Cooke, F.L. (2019). Why and when knowledge hiding in theworkplace is harmful: a review of the literature and directions for future research in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific J. Hum. Resour., 57: 470–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12198
Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C.K. & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of lmx. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4): 531–543.       
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.768
Yadav, M., Choudhary, S. & Jain, S. (2019). Transformational leadership and knowledge sharing behavior in freelancers: a moderated mediation model with employee engagement and social support. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 12(2): 202-224. 
https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-08-2017-0030
Yang, J., Lin, C., Fang, S. & Huang, C. (2019). An uncertainty management theory on the effects of abusive supervision. Management Decision, 57(11): 3079-3095.       
https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866231153098
Yousef, D.A. (2000). Organizational commitment as of the relationship between Islamic work ethic and attitudes toward organizational change. Human Relations, 53(4): 513-537. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700534003
Yousef, D.A. (2001). Islamic work ethic–A moderator between organizational commitment and job satisfaction in a cross-cultural context. Personnel review, 30(2): 152-169.           
https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480110380325
Zahid, S.M. (2019). Impact of abusive supervision on project success: mediating role of knowledge hiding and moderating role of machiavellianism. Faculty of management & social sciences department of management sciences. Capital University of science and technology, Islamabad.
Zweig, D. & Scott, K.A. (2018). Exploring Distrust, Paranoia, Knowledge Hiding and Abusive Supervision Over Time. Academy of Management, (1): 10312.
https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.10312abstract
CAPTCHA Image